5027 Green Bay Road, Suite 118 • Kenosha, WI 53144

262.925.8600

How toxic is Splenda?
(Also known as sucralose or 1, 6-dideoxy-BETA-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranoside)

Harmless sweetener or deadly poison?
The World Natural Health Organization did a study on the safety of Splenda. As it says in the first report: "Splenda/sucralose is simply chlorinated sugar; a chlorocarbon. Common chlorocarbons include carbon tetrachloride, trichlorethelene and methylene chloride, all deadly. Chlorine is nature's Doberman attack dog, a highly excitable, ferocious atomic element employed as a biocide in bleach, disinfectants, insecticide, [and] WWI poison gas..."

The report continues: "Sucralose is a molecule of sugar chemically manipulated to surrender three hydroxyl groups (hydrogen + oxygen) and replace them with three chlorine atoms. Natural sugar is a hydrocarbon built around 12 carbon atoms. When turned into Splenda it becomes a chlorocarbon...[like] DDT." (DDT is a famous pesticide banned in the 70s for being massively carcinogenic.)

"In test animals Splenda produced swollen livers, as do all chlorocarbon poisons, and also calcified the kidneys of test animals in toxicity studies. The brain and nervous system are highly subject to metabolic toxicities and solvency damages by these chemicals. Their high solvency attacks the human nervous system and many other body systems including genetics and the immune function. Thus, chlorocarbon poisoning an cause cancer, birth defects, and immune system destruction. These are well known effects of Dioxin and PCBs which are known deadly chlorocarbons."


Dangers of Splenda
Why not use Splenda?
Well, research in animals has shown that sucralose can cause many problems such as:
  • Shrunken thymus glands (up to 40% shrinkage)
  • Enlarged liver and kidneys
  • Atrophy of lymph follicles in the spleen and thymus
  • Increased cecal (a part of the colon) weight
  • Reduced growth rate
  • Decreased red blood cell count
  • Hyperplasia of the pelvis
  • Extension of the pregnancy period
  • Aborted pregnancy
  • Decreased fetal body weights and placental weights
  • Diarrhea

Is sucralose absorbed or metabolized?
Despite the manufacturer's claims to the contrary, sucralose is significantly absorbed and metabolized by the body. According to the FDA's "Final Rule" report, 11% to 27% of sucralose is absorbed in humans, and the rest is excreted unchanged in feces. According to the Japanese Food Sanitation Council, as much as 40% of ingested sucralose is absorbed. Plasma sucralose has been reported to have a half-life of anywhere from 2 to 5 hours in most studies, although the half-life in rabbits was found to be much longer at about 36 hours. About 20% to 30% of absorbed sucralose is metabolized. Both the metabolites and unchanged absorbed sucralose are excreted in urine. The absorbed sucralose has been found to concentrate in the liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract. According to The Sucralose Toxicity Information Center, sucralose is broken down "into small amounts of 1,6-dichlorofructose, a chemical which has not been adequately tested in humans."

Protecting their image
Tate & Lyle and Johnson & Johnson (owners of Splenda) have been going on a domain sucking spree to get a variety of domain names that imply a negative association with Splenda, the chemical sucralose artificial sweetener.

The Domain Tools Blog writes, "Splenda wants to shortcut any free speech or backlash to their product by registering all the negative domains," and explains how and why companies have been pro-active in buying domain names with negative association before any critics do. The list of domain names does indicate that Tate & Lyle and Johnson & Johnson have certain expectations of what that criticism is about given the names of the domains such as splendakills.com, victimsofsplenda.com, splendatoxicity.com, and many others. Tate & Lyle and Johnson & Johnson have bought as many as 200 and possibly as high as 300 negative domain names. Is there something these companies know about Splenda that makes them feel the need to buy all these domain names before someone else can?


How safe do you feel when the company who makes this particular sweetener makes this claim: "We know our product might be poison, so let's prevent people from talking about it."


How was Splenda discovered?
Sucralose was discovered in 1976 by scientists from Tate & Lyle, working with researchers at Queen Elizabeth College (now part of King's College London). It was discovered by Leslie Hough and a young Indian chemist Shashikant Phadnis. The duo were trying to make an insecticide. On a late-summer day, Phadnis was told to test the powder. Phadnis thought that Leslie asked him to taste it; so he did. He found the compound to be ridiculously sweet (the final formula was 600 times sweeter than sugar). They worked with Tate & Lyle for a year before settling down on the final formula.

Keep your distance
Avoid using these artificial sweeteners at all costs, as well as any products that contain them. They are not natural by any means, and they can all be hazardous to your health. (Read labels carefully!):

  • Splenda (sucralose)
  • Aspartame
  • NutraSweet
  • Sweet 'n' Low
  • Equal
  • Saccharin
  • Acesulfame-K
  • Neotame
  • Cyclamate


Related links
Which sweeteners are safe?
The dangers of Splenda
Splenda? Is it safe?
The truth about NutraSweet
124 ways sugar can ruin your health
Diabetes and artifical sweeteners
Soft drinks and obesity
Blood sugar disorders

Return to articles main page